Usability
Indicator 3f
Materials support teachers in planning and providing effective learning experiences by providing quality questions to help guide students' mathematical development.
AI proposed
The official Evidence Guide for 3f assesses whether materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed for instructional activities. The retrieved evidence consists of student problem pages, chapter overviews, and Mathematical Practice descriptions — it shows activities that clearly require physical materials (rulers, protractors, coordinate grids, technology in [E8] and [E12]; chips/tiles models in [E5] and [E10]), but no front-matter or lesson-level compilation that lists those supplies comprehensively was retrieved. There is scattered evidence that supplies are referenced within lessons, but no structural evidence of a course-, unit-, or lesson-level materials list, so partial coverage is the most defensible read.
judge flagged insufficient evidence
Your decision
The AI’s score is preserved — your decision is recorded alongside it. Accept / Skip advance to the next flagged indicator.
Evidence Guide· what the rubric asks for · click to expand
Indicator 3f Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support
instructional activities.
Scoring
1 point
● Materials include a comprehensive list of supplies
needed to support the instructional activities.
0 points
● Materials do not include a comprehensive list of
supplies needed to support instructional activities.
About this indicator:
What is the purpose of this Indicator?
This indicator examines the series to determine if the materials contain a comprehensive list of materials needed
to support implementation.
Indicator 3f Guiding Question:
Do the materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities?
Evidence Collection
Review the materials across the series.
Look for and record evidence to:
● Determine whether a comprehensive list of required materials is provided.
Cluster Meeting
During the cluster meeting:
Discuss and answer the following questions to support consensus scoring conversations:
● Does the series provide a comprehensive list of required materials? At what level(s) is the support
provided (course, unit/module, lesson, etc.)?
Gateway 3: Usability
Criterion 3.1 The program includes opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize
materials with integrity and to further develop their own understanding of the
content.
Retrieved evidence (12 chunks)
- E1 · grade-6 — www.uen.org/emedia/resources/MSM/6Ch2Student.pdfrel 0.54
- E2 · grade-6 — www.uen.org/emedia/resources/MSM/6Ch6MF.pdfrel 0.53
- E3 · grade-6 — www.uen.org/emedia/resources/MSM/6Ch6student.pdfrel 0.52
- E4 · grade-6 — www.uen.org/emedia/resources/MSM/6Ch1WBK.pdfrel 0.50
- E5 · grade-7 — www.uen.org/emedia/resources/MSM/7Ch2Student_Workbook.pdfrel 0.49
- E6 · grade-7 — www.uen.org/emedia/resources/MSM/7Ch1Student_Workbook.pdfrel 0.49
- E7 · grade-7 — www.uen.org/emedia/resources/MSM/7Ch6Textbook.pdfrel 0.48
- E8 · grade-7 — www.uen.org/emedia/resources/MSM/7-Mathematical-Foundations-Complete.pdfrel 0.47
- E9 · grade-7 — www.uen.org/emedia/resources/MSM/7-Mathematical-Foundations-Complete.pdfrel 0.47
- E10 · grade-7 — www.uen.org/emedia/resources/MSM/7Ch2Student_Workbook.pdfrel 0.46
- E11 · grade-7 — www.uen.org/emedia/resources/MSM/7-Mathematical-Foundations-Complete.pdfrel 0.45
- E12 · grade-7 — www.uen.org/emedia/resources/MSM/7-Mathematical-Foundations-Complete.pdfrel 0.45
Evidence is stored as references + retrieval scores (the chunk text isn’t snapshotted); open the source to read the passage in context.