Usability
Indicator 3c
Materials include standards correlation information that explains the role of the standards in the context of the overall series.
AI proposed
Standards correlation is present consistently throughout the series: every lesson lists the specific CCSS addressed across reading, writing, speaking/listening, and language strands (e.g., E1 RI.11-12.1/SL.11-12.4/W.11-12.10; E2 L.9-10.1/RI.9-10.1/W.9-10.5; E4, E6, E10 spanning grades 9-12). Formative Section Diagnostic assessments explicitly identify their assessed standards (E9, E12, and diagnostic lessons E1, E5, E7, E8), and summative/culminating work is tied to standards via the 'Culminating Task Connections' and standards lists in the Section Diagnostic (E9). This structural correlation across the full grade band satisfies all required components of the indicator.
Your decision
The AI’s score is preserved — your decision is recorded alongside it. Accept / Skip advance to the next flagged indicator.
Evidence Guide· what the rubric asks for · click to expand
Indicator 3c Materials include a standards correlation information document.
Scoring
1 point
● Correlation information is present for the ELA
standards addressed throughout the grade
level/series.
● Materials identify the standards assessed for
formative assessments.
● Materials identify the standards assessed for
culminating tasks/summative assessments.
0 points
● Standards correlations are inaccurate or missing.
About this indicator:
What is the purpose of this Indicator?
This indicator examines whether materials contain a standards correlation information document, which maps or
aligns the content and activities within the materials to specific ELA Common Core State Standards. This
document serves as a resource for teachers to quickly identify how and where the material addresses particular
standards, enabling better planning and instruction. It helps ensure that teaching is aligned with required
educational benchmarks and offers transparency on how the materials support meeting those standards. Lastly,
this indicator looks at whether materials clearly identify the CCSS assessed in each formative and summative
assessment to further maximize teacher clarity.
Resources:
● Common Core English Language Arts Standards
Indicator 3c Guiding Question:
Do the materials include a standards correlation information document?
Evidence Collection
In the instructional materials being reviewed:
● Consider how teacher materials provide documentation that addresses how individual units, lessons,
or activities throughout the series are aligned to reading, writing, speaking, and/or listening (Common
Core ELA Standards), as applicable.
● Ensure that the correlation document covers all relevant ELA standards for the entire grade level or
series, including reading, writing, speaking, and listening standards.
● Look to see that the materials identify the standards assessed in formative and summative
assessments.
Note:
● If standards correlation is inconsistent between levels (I.e., from the overview to a module or a lesson).
● If standards correlation is inaccurate.
Cluster Meeting
Preparing for the cluster meeting:
● How do teacher materials provide documentation that addresses how individual units, lessons, or
activities throughout the series are aligned to reading, writing, speaking, and/or listening (Common
Core ELA Standards), as applicable?
● Does the correlation document cover all relevant ELA standards for the entire grade level or series,
including reading, writing, speaking, and listening standards?
● Do the materials identify the standards assessed in formative and summative assessments?
During the cluster meeting:
● Discuss how teacher materials provide documentation that addresses how individual units, lessons, or
activities throughout the series are aligned to reading, writing, speaking, and/or listening (Common
Core ELA Standards), as applicable.
● Discuss whether the correlation document covers all relevant ELA standards for the entire grade level
or series, including reading, writing, speaking, and listening standards.
● Discuss whether the materials identify the standards assessed in formative and summative
assessments.
Gateway 3: Teacher and Student Supports
Criterion 3.1 Materials include opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize
materials with integrity and to further develop their own understanding of the
content.
Retrieved evidence (12 chunks)
- E1 · grade-11 — access.openupresources.org/curricula/odell-hs-literacy/grade-11/development-unit-3/section-3/lesson-7/index.htmlrel 0.54
- E2 · grade-9 — access.openupresources.org/curricula/odell-hs-literacy/grade-9/development-unit-3/section-2/lesson-6/index.htmlrel 0.51
- E3 · grade-11 — access.openupresources.org/curricula/odell-hs-literacy/grade-11/development-unit-3/section-3/lesson-5/index.htmlrel 0.51
- E4 · grade-12 — access.openupresources.org/curricula/odell-hs-literacy/grade-12/development-unit-4/section-1/lesson-12/index.htmlrel 0.50
- E5 · grade-9 — access.openupresources.org/curricula/odell-hs-literacy/grade-9/development-unit-3/section-4/lesson-5/index.htmlrel 0.49
- E6 · grade-11 — access.openupresources.org/curricula/odell-hs-literacy/grade-11/development-unit-3/section-2/lesson-1/index.htmlrel 0.48
- E7 · grade-11 — access.openupresources.org/curricula/odell-hs-literacy/grade-11/development-unit-3/section-4/lesson-7/index.htmlrel 0.48
- E8 · grade-10 — access.openupresources.org/curricula/odell-hs-literacy/grade-10/foundation-unit-1/section-3/lesson-7/index.htmlrel 0.48
- E9 · grade-12 — access.openupresources.org/curricula/odell-hs-literacy/grade-12/development-unit-4/section-1/diagnostic.htmlrel 0.47
- E10 · grade-10 — access.openupresources.org/curricula/odell-hs-literacy/grade-10/foundation-unit-1/section-3/lesson-1/index.htmlrel 0.46
- E11 · grade-11 — access.openupresources.org/curricula/odell-hs-literacy/grade-11/development-unit-3/section-5/lesson-3/index.htmlrel 0.46
- E12 · grade-9 — access.openupresources.org/curricula/odell-hs-literacy/grade-9/development-unit-3/section-1/diagnostic.htmlrel 0.45
Evidence is stored as references + retrieval scores (the chunk text isn’t snapshotted); open the source to read the passage in context.