Designed for NGSS
Indicator 1h
Materials clearly represent three-dimensional learning objectives within the learning sequences.
AI proposed
Every OpenSciEd lesson includes Lesson-Level Performance Expectations (LLPEs) explicitly designed as three-dimensional objectives combining SEP, DCI, and CCC elements with font-coded source alignment [E1][E3], and the program states LLPEs 'detail the specific dimensions and elements used and assessed in each lesson' [E2]. The objectives consistently provide element-level specificity (e.g., 'SEP: 2.3; DCI: PS2.B.3, PS1.A.2; CCC: 1.1, 6.2' [E10]; 'SEP: 7.5; DCI: ESS1.C.2; CCC: 1.1' [E6]; 'SEP: 8.2, 8.5; DCI: ESS2.C.1, PS2.B.3; CCC: 1.5' [E11]). Materials also map matching student-facing opportunities to use those elements via 'when to check for understanding' slides and 'what to look/listen for' guidance [E4][E9][E12], satisfying both required components.
Your decision
The AI’s score is preserved — your decision is recorded alongside it. Accept / Skip advance to the next flagged indicator.
Evidence Guide· what the rubric asks for · click to expand
s, or scientific concepts.
● Determine where students have the opportunity to iterate on their thinking as they figure out novel,
uncertain, or unexplained phenomena, problems, or scientific concepts. This includes both discourse and
individual reflection.
● Determine where student sensemaking requires meaningful, intentional, and integrated use of SEPs,
CCCs, and DCIs.
● Determine where meaningful and intentional presence of two-dimensional integration of SEPs and DCIs,
CCCs and DCIs, or CCCs and SEPs occurs.
● Identify the presence of above and/or below grade band elements associated with sensemaking.
Cluster Meeting
Discuss and answer the following questions to support consensus scoring conversations:
● How often do learning sequences contain three-dimensional sensemaking?
● How often do learning sequences contain two-dimensional sensemaking?
● How often do learning sequences contain opportunities for students to iterate on their thinking as they
engage in sensemaking?
HS Science Evidence Guide v2.0 Updated July 2025
-- 20 of 89 --
Gateway 1: Designed for NGSS
Criterion 1.2 Three-Dimensional Learning and Assessment: Materials are designed for
three-dimensional learning and assessment.
Indicator 1h Materials clearly represent three-dimensional learning objectives within the
learning sequences.
Scoring
2 points
● The materials consistently
provide element-level
three-dimensional learning
objectives.
AND
● Materials consistently provide
opportunities for students to
use and engage with the
elements of the three
dimensions present in the
objectives.
1 point
● The materials
---
the overall program that gives students
sufficient opportunities to reach or exceed all parts of the standards.” (Critical Features of Instructional Materials
Design for Today’s Science Standards, p. 6)
Resources:
● 2015 Achieve NGSS Innovations
● Guide to Implementing the Next Generation Science Standards
● Critical Features of Instructional Materials Design for Today’s Science Standards
Indicator 1h Guiding Question:
Are the materials designed to clearly represent three-dimensional learning objectives within the learning
sequences?
Evidence Collection
Locations to review:
● Review the learning sequences and learning opportunities in both student and teacher materials across
the course.
Resources to use:
● Review NGSS progression documents and standards as needed. Use the Codes for NGSS Elements
document.
Record evidence:
● Identify the learning objectives for each learning sequence or opportunity. Determine if the learning
objectives are three dimensional and if they provide element-level information.
o If component level specificity is provided, assume all elements within that component are
intended to be present
● Determine where there is a match between the learning objectives and what students are actually asked
to do in learning sequences and opportunities.
Cluster Meeting
Discuss and answer the following questions to support consensus scoring conversations:
● How often are three-dimensional learning objectives present? If so, do they detail element-level
specificity?
● How often do learning sequences or opportunities provide opportunities for students to use the el
---
idence Collection
Locations to review:
● All identified formative assessment tasks in both student and teacher materials.
Resources to use:
● Review NGSS progression documents and standards as needed. Use the Codes for NGSS Elements
document.
Record evidence:
● Use the learning objectives identified in indicator 1h.
● Identify elements of the learning objectives in the formative assessments.
● Formative assessments can include activities for individuals or groups of students.
● Determine how many elements of the learning objectives are addressed in the assessments.
○ Consider all formative assessments within each sequence associated with a set of learning
objectives.
● Look for the presence of all elements indicated by the objectives (including off-grade band elements).
● Do not focus on supports for interpreting assessments. These are covered in the examination of the
assessment system in indicators 3g and 3n in Gateway 3.
Cluster Meeting
Discuss and answer the following questions to support consensus scoring conversations:
● Which types of assessments are used to support the formative process? Where are they present? Are
they always consistent in form and function, or do they vary?
● How many elements are evaluated in the formative assessments associated with a set of learning
objectives?
○ How many learning sequences or opportunities assess most or all of the elements from the
associated learning objectives?
○ How do formative assessments within the assessment system reveal student progress and use
of the three dimensions as connected to the learning objectives?
HS Scien
Retrieved evidence (12 chunks)
- E1 · grade-10 — openscied-uploads-production.s3.amazonaws.com/G10_UCO/hires/C.2%20Teacher%20Edition.pdfrel 0.64
- E2 · grade-10 — openscied-uploads-production.s3.amazonaws.com/G10_UCO/hires/C.2%20Teacher%20Edition.pdfrel 0.61
- E3 · grade-10 — openscied-uploads-production.s3.amazonaws.com/G10_UCR/hires/C.3%20Teacher%20Edition.pdfrel 0.61
- E4 · grade-10 — openscied-uploads-production.s3.amazonaws.com/G10_UCR/hires/C.3%20Teacher%20Edition.pdfrel 0.46
- E5 · grade-10 — openscied-uploads-production.s3.amazonaws.com/G10_UCR/hires/C.3%20Teacher%20Edition.pdfrel 0.45
- E6 · grade-10 — openscied-uploads-production.s3.amazonaws.com/G10_UCR/hires/C.3%20Teacher%20Edition.pdfrel 0.45
- E7 · grade-10 — openscied-uploads-production.s3.amazonaws.com/G10_UCR/hires/C.3%20Teacher%20Edition.pdfrel 0.45
- E8 · grade-10 — openscied-uploads-production.s3.amazonaws.com/G10_UCO/hires/C.2%20Teacher%20Edition.pdfrel 0.44
- E9 · grade-10 — openscied-uploads-production.s3.amazonaws.com/G10_UCO/hires/C.2%20Teacher%20Edition.pdfrel 0.44
- E10 · grade-10 — openscied-uploads-production.s3.amazonaws.com/G10_UCR/hires/C.3%20Teacher%20Edition.pdfrel 0.44
- E11 · grade-10 — openscied-uploads-production.s3.amazonaws.com/G10_UCR/hires/C.3%20Teacher%20Edition.pdfrel 0.43
- E12 · grade-10 — openscied-uploads-production.s3.amazonaws.com/G10_UCR/hires/C.3%20Teacher%20Edition.pdfrel 0.42
Evidence is stored as references + retrieval scores (the chunk text isn’t snapshotted); open the source to read the passage in context.