Teacher & Student Supports
Indicator 3g
The assessment system provides consistent opportunities to determine
AI proposed
The IM K-12 Math assessment system provides consistent, structured opportunities across the year: each unit opens with a diagnostic ('Check Your Readiness'), each lesson includes a formative cool-down and distributed practice problems, and units close with mid-unit and end-of-unit summative assessments [E1, E3, E5, E7, E11, E12]. A variety of item types (multiple-choice, multiple response, short answer, restricted/extended constructed response) capture different aspects of learning, with rubrics, complete solutions, and standard alignments supporting fair evaluation [E2, E4, E6, E11]. Teacher guidance for interpretation and next steps is explicit: distractors function diagnostically, task commentary flags misconceptions so teachers can adjust, and cool-down guidance offers concrete remediation strategies when students struggle [E3, E6, E7, E8]. All three required components are clearly met.
Your decision
The AI’s score is preserved — your decision is recorded alongside it. Accept / Skip advance to the next flagged indicator.
Evidence Guide· what the rubric asks for · click to expand
Indicator 3g The assessment system provides consistent opportunities to determine
student learning throughout the school year. The assessment system
provides sufficient teacher guidance for evaluating student performance and
determining instructional next steps.
Scoring
2 points
● The assessment system
provides opportunities to
determine student learning
throughout the school year.
AND
● The assessment system
provides sufficient teacher
guidance for evaluating
student performance.
AND
● The assessment system
provides sufficient teacher
guidance for interpreting
student performance and
determining next instructional
steps.
1 point
● The assessment system
provides opportunities to
determine student learning
throughout the school year, but
not consistently.
OR
● The assessment system
provides sufficient teacher
guidance for evaluating
student performance, but not
consistently.
OR
● The assessment system
provides sufficient teacher
guidance for interpreting
student performance and
determining next instructional
steps, but not consistently.
0 points
● The assessment system does
not provide opportunities to
determine student learning
throughout the school year.
AND
● The assessment system does
not provide sufficient teacher
guidance for evaluating
student performance.
AND
● The assessment system does
not provide sufficient teacher
guidance for interpreting
student performance and
determining next instructional
steps.
About this indicator:
What is the purpose of this Indicator?
This indicator examines whether the assessment system within materials offers regular and consistent
opportunities to evaluate student learning progress throughout the school year. It emphasizes the importance of
a well-structured assessment system that not only tracks student performance consistently over time but also
provides teachers with clear guidance on how to interpret assessment results. This includes offering insights on
evaluating student understanding and making informed decisions about instructional next steps. By doing so,
teachers identify areas where students may need additional support or enrichment, allowing for timely
interventions and personalized learning pathways that enhance student growth and achievement.
Indicator 3g Guiding Question:
Does the assessment system provide consistent opportunities to determine student learning throughout the
school year, sufficient teacher guidance for evaluating student performance, and sufficient teacher guidance
for determining instructional next steps?
Evidence Collection
Note: this indicator looks at the assessment system as a whole and how all of the types of assessments in a
program work together to show student progress toward mastery and provide guidance to teachers about
how to adjust instruction. Information specific to formative and summative assessments is looked at in
Gateway 1).
In the instructional materials being reviewed:
● Ensure the assessment system provides regular and structured opportunities throughout the school year
to measure student learning. This should include formative assessments that offer ongoing insights and
summative assessments that evaluate cumulative learning.
● Look for a variety of assessment types (e.g., quizzes, performance tasks, summative assessments,
standardized tests) to capture different aspects of student learning and demonstrate a comprehensive
view of progress.
● Ensure that there is comprehensive guidance for teachers on how to administer the system of
assessments, including instructions, rubrics, and criteria for consistent and fair evaluation of student
performance.
● Confirm that the materials include clear guidance on how to interpret the results of student assessments
throughout all assessments.
● Across the assessment system as a whole, look for specific recommendations or strategies for teachers
on how to use assessment data to inform instructional decisions, adjust teaching plans, and provide
targeted interventions or enrichment activities based on student needs.
● Assess whether the system includes mechanisms for providing timely and constructive feedback to
students, helping them understand their progress and areas for improvement.
● Determine if the assessment system allows for flexibility to accommodate diverse learning environments,
student populations, and instructional methods.
Cluster Meeting
Preparing for the cluster meeting:
● Does the assessment system provide regular and structured opportunities throughout the school year to
measure student learning, including both formative assessments that offer ongoing insights and
summative assessments that evaluate cumulative learning?
● Is there a variety of assessment types (e.g., quizzes, performance tasks, summative assessments,
standardized tests) to capture different aspects of student learning and demonstrate a comprehensive
view of progress?
● Is there comprehensive guidance for teachers on how to administer the assessment system, including
instructions, rubrics, and criteria for consistent and fair evaluation of student performance?
● Do the materials include clear guidance on how to interpret the results of student assessments across all
assessments?
● Are there specific recommendations or strategies for teachers on how to use assessment data to inform
instructional decisions, adjust teaching plans, and provide targeted interventions or enrichment activities
based on student needs?
● Does the system include mechanisms for providing timely and constructive feedback to students, helping
them understand their progress and areas for improvement?
● Does the assessment system allow for flexibility to accommodate diverse learning environments, student
populations, and instructional methods?
During the cluster meeting:
● Discuss whether the assessment system provides regular and structured opportunities throughout the
school year to measure student learning, including both formative assessments that offer ongoing
insights and summative assessments that evaluate cumulative learning.
● Discuss whether there are a variety of assessment types (e.g., quizzes, performance tasks, summative
assessments, standardized tests) to capture different aspects of student learning and demonstrate a
comprehensive view of progress?
● Discuss whether there is comprehensive guidance for teachers on how to administer the assessment
system, including instructions, rubrics, and criteria for consistent and fair evaluation of student
performance.
● Discuss whether the materials include clear guidance on how to interpret the results of student
assessments across all assessments.
● Discuss whether there are specific recommendations or strategies for teachers on how to use
assessment data to inform instructional decisions, adjust teaching plans, and provide targeted
interventions or enrichment activities based on student needs.
● Discuss whether the system includes mechanisms for providing timely and constructive feedback to
students, helping them understand their progress and areas for improvement.
● Discuss whether the assessment system allows for flexibility to accommodate diverse learning
environments, student populations, and instructional methods.
Gateway 3: Teacher and Student Supports
Criterion 3.1 Materials include opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize
materials with integrity and to further develop their own understanding of the
content.
Retrieved evidence (12 chunks)
- E1 · hs-teacher-guide — im.kendallhunt.com/HS/teachers/learning_goals_and_targets.htmlrel 0.52
- E2 · hs-teacher-guide — im.kendallhunt.com/HS/teachers/summative_assessments.htmlrel 0.50
- E3 · hs-teacher-guide — im.kendallhunt.com/HS/teachers/learning_goals_and_targets.htmlrel 0.50
- E4 · hs-teacher-guide — im.kendallhunt.com/HS/teachers/summative_assessments.htmlrel 0.46
- E5 · hs-teacher-guide — im.kendallhunt.com/HS/teachers/diagnostic_assessments.htmlrel 0.44
- E6 · hs-teacher-guide — im.kendallhunt.com/HS/teachers/summative_assessments.htmlrel 0.43
- E7 · hs-teacher-guide — im.kendallhunt.com/HS/teachers/cool_downs.htmlrel 0.43
- E8 · hs-teacher-guide — im.kendallhunt.com/HS/teachers/design_principles.htmlrel 0.43
- E9 · hs-teacher-guide — im.kendallhunt.com/HS/teachers/typical_lesson.htmlrel 0.43
- E10 · hs-teacher-guide — im.kendallhunt.com/HS/teachers/how_to.htmlrel 0.42
- E11 · hs-teacher-guide — im.kendallhunt.com/HS/teachers/summative_assessments.htmlrel 0.40
- E12 · hs-teacher-guide — im.kendallhunt.com/HS/teachers/about.htmlrel 0.40
Evidence is stored as references + retrieval scores (the chunk text isn’t snapshotted); open the source to read the passage in context.