Skip to content

Focus and Coherence

1f

Indicator 1f

Assessment information is included in the materials to indicate which

Open Up High School Mathematics Traditional·HS·judged by anthropic/claude-opus-4-7
Thin evidence

AI proposed

2/2Meetsconf 0.82

The teacher guide describes multiple formal assessment types—diagnostic 'Check Your Readiness,' mid-unit, and end-of-unit assessments [E2][E5][E7][E10]—and critically states that 'All summative assessment problems include a complete solution and standard alignment' [E10], with extended/constructed-response items including rubrics. This is direct structural evidence that the materials consistently identify the standards assessed for formal assessments at the item level. This satisfies the indicator's requirement for consistent standard identification on formal assessments.

Your decision

The AI’s score is preserved — your decision is recorded alongside it. Accept / Skip advance to the next flagged indicator.

Evidence Guide· what the rubric asks for · click to expand

Indicator 1f Assessment information is included in the materials to indicate which

standards are assessed.

Scoring

2 points

● Materials consistently

identify the standards and

practices assessed for

formal assessments.

1 point

● Materials consistently

identify the standards

and/or practices assessed

for formal assessments, but

do not include all standards

and/or practices for the

grade or course level.

0 points

● Materials do not identify the

standards and practices

assessed for the formal

assessments.

About this indicator:

What is the purpose of this Indicator?

This indicator examines the assessment materials to determine whether they identify the standards being

assessed for all formal assessment types. It is important to note that some assessments may be building toward

the standards and not intended to measure full depth of the standards; these assessments should identify which

aspects of the standards are being assessed and/or being built toward.

Formal assessments are determined by the publisher and could include all types: formative, summative, etc.

Reviewers look for a list of standards assessed for the entire assessment and/or associated with each item/task.

Reviewers look for evidence of identification only.

Indicator 1f Guiding Question:

Does assessment information included in the materials indicate which standards are assessed?

Evidence Collection

Review assessments and corresponding assessment guidance across the series. *Note: this is not an item

analysis.

Look for and record evidence to:

● Describe how and where assessments clearly identify which standards are being assessed. Include the

level at which the assessment is given (unit, lesson, etc.) and the level at which standards are identified

(assessment, task, item, etc.).

● Describe any instances where standards are listed incorrectly or are not from the appropriate grade

level/band.

● In the event that the assessments build toward grade-level or grade-band standards, describe whether the

assessment information identifies which aspects of the standards are assessed. Also, describe how and

where the materials include information that details how the assessments build toward the standards for

the grade level or band.

Cluster Meeting

Discuss and answer the following questions to support consensus scoring conversations:

● Where and how do the materials clearly identify which standards are assessed?

● Do the standards correlations or assessment guidance documents indicate if all standards for the grade

level/band are assessed by the end of the grade level/band?

● If assessments are building towards the standards, do the materials identify which aspects of the

standards are being assessed and how these contribute to building toward grade-level/grade-band

standards?

Gateway 1: Focus & Coherence

Criterion 1.1 Materials assess grade-level content and give all students extensive work with

grade-level problems to meet the full intent of grade-level standards.

Retrieved evidence (12 chunks)

  • E1 · hs-teacher-guideim.kendallhunt.com/HS/teachers/learning_goals_and_targets.htmlrel 0.56
  • E2 · hs-teacher-guideim.kendallhunt.com/HS/teachers/about.htmlrel 0.55
  • E3 · hs-teacher-guideim.kendallhunt.com/HS/teachers/learning_goals_and_targets.htmlrel 0.54
  • E4 · hs-teacher-guideim.kendallhunt.com/HS/teachers/summative_assessments.htmlrel 0.48
  • E5 · hs-teacher-guideim.kendallhunt.com/HS/teachers/diagnostic_assessments.htmlrel 0.48
  • E6 · hs-teacher-guideim.kendallhunt.com/HS/teachers/design_principles.htmlrel 0.47
  • E7 · hs-teacher-guideim.kendallhunt.com/HS/teachers/summative_assessments.htmlrel 0.46
  • E8 · hs-teacher-guideim.kendallhunt.com/HS/teachers/family_info.htmlrel 0.46
  • E9 · hs-teacher-guideim.kendallhunt.com/HS/teachers/typical_lesson.htmlrel 0.44
  • E10 · hs-teacher-guideim.kendallhunt.com/HS/teachers/summative_assessments.htmlrel 0.44
  • E11 · hs-teacher-guideim.kendallhunt.com/HS/teachers/summative_assessments.htmlrel 0.43
  • E12 · algebra-1-supportsim.kendallhunt.com/HS/teachers/4/4/resources.htmlrel 0.43

Evidence is stored as references + retrieval scores (the chunk text isn’t snapshotted); open the source to read the passage in context.