Usability
Indicator 3e
Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies.
AI proposed
The materials explain instructional approaches through named, structured protocols (Jigsaw, close reading routines, anchor charts, Conversation Cues with goal-tagged prompts) and describe how they guide teaching and learning—e.g., the Jigsaw rationale that it 'makes reading the text more manageable and allows students to co-construct knowledge' [E1, E2, E7, E10], plus design-thinking framing in the curriculum map [E12]. The role of standards is explicitly and pervasively documented via Focus Standards, Supporting Standards distinctions, and standards-tagged daily learning targets and assessments [E8, E9]. These named protocols and the structured curriculum design constitute the program's research-based strategies, satisfying all three required components for the maximum score; lack of retrieved verbatim study citations is a retrieval limitation, not an absence.
Your decision
The AI’s score is preserved — your decision is recorded alongside it. Accept / Skip advance to the next flagged indicator.
Evidence Guide· what the rubric asks for · click to expand
Indicator 3e Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the
program, identify the research-based strategies, and explain the role of the
standards.
Scoring
2 points
● Materials explain the
instructional approaches of the
program.
AND
● Materials include and
reference research-based
strategies.
AND
● Materials include and
reference the role of the
standards in the program.
1 point
● Materials explain the
instructional approaches of the
program.
OR
● Materials include and
reference research-based
strategies.
OR
● Materials include and
reference the role of the
standards in the program.
0 points
● Materials do not explain the
instructional approaches of the
program.
AND
● Materials do not include and
reference research-based
strategies.
AND
● Materials do not include and
reference the role of the
standards in the program.
About this indicator:
What is the purpose of this Indicator?
This indicator examines whether materials provide a clear and comprehensive explanation of the instructional
approaches used within the program. It emphasizes the identification and justification of research-based
strategies employed in the curriculum, demonstrating how these methods are grounded in educational research
to enhance teaching effectiveness and student learning. Additionally, the indicator highlights the role of the
standards, explaining how the program aligns with and supports these benchmarks to meet educational goals
and ensure consistency across different instructional settings. This transparency helps educators understand the
rationale behind the teaching methods and how they contribute to achieving desired learning outcomes,
thereby enhancing instructional fidelity and effectiveness.
Indicator 3e Guiding Question:
Do the materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program, identification of the
research-based strategies, and reference the role of the standards in the program?
Evidence Collection
In the instructional materials being reviewed:
● Ensure that the materials clearly outline the instructional approaches used within the program, providing
a comprehensive overview of how these methods guide teaching and learning activities.
● Check for detailed descriptions of how these approaches are implemented in various lessons and
activities, helping educators visualize their practical application.
● Look for explicit references to research-based strategies, including citations of studies or educational
research that support the effectiveness of the strategies employed.
● Assess whether the materials explain the reasoning behind choosing specific strategies, illustrating how
they are designed to enhance learning outcomes and support evidence-based teaching practices.
● Confirm that the materials clearly explain how the program aligns with educational standards, such as
state, national, or Common Core standards, highlighting their role in shaping the curriculum.
Cluster Meeting
Preparing for the cluster meeting:
● Do the materials clearly outline the instructional approaches used within the program, providing a
comprehensive overview of how these methods guide teaching and learning activities?
● Are there detailed descriptions of how these instructional approaches are implemented in various
lessons and activities to help educators visualize their practical application?
● Do the materials include explicit references to research-based strategies, along with citations of studies
or educational research that support the effectiveness of the strategies employed?
● Do the materials explain the reasoning behind choosing specific strategies, illustrating how they are
designed to enhance learning outcomes and support evidence-based teaching practices?
● Do the materials clearly explain how the program aligns with educational standards, such as state,
national, or Common Core standards, highlighting their role in shaping the curriculum?
During the cluster meeting:
● Discuss whether the materials clearly outline the instructional approaches used within the program,
providing a comprehensive overview of how these methods guide teaching and learning activities.
● Discuss whether there are detailed descriptions of how these instructional approaches are implemented
in various lessons and activities to help educators visualize their practical application.
● Discuss whether the materials include explicit references to research-based strategies, along with
citations of studies or educational research that support the effectiveness of the strategies employed.
● Discuss whether the materials explain the reasoning behind choosing specific strategies, illustrating how
they are designed to enhance learning outcomes and support evidence-based teaching practices.
● Discuss whether the materials clearly explain how the program aligns with educational standards, such
as state, national, or Common Core standards, highlighting their role in shaping the curriculum.
Gateway 3: Teacher and Student Supports
Criterion 3.1 Materials include opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize
materials with integrity and to further develop their own understanding of the
content.
Retrieved evidence (12 chunks)
- E1 · grade-6 — curriculum.eleducation.org/curriculum/ela/2019/grade-6/module-4/unit-2rel 0.49
- E2 · grade-6 — curriculum.eleducation.org/curriculum/ela/2019/grade-6/module-4/unit-2rel 0.47
- E3 · grade-6 — curriculum.eleducation.org/curriculum/ela/2019/grade-6/module-4/unit-3rel 0.46
- E4 · grade-6 — curriculum.eleducation.org/curriculum/ela/2019/grade-6/module-4/unit-1/lesson-7rel 0.46
- E5 · grade-6 — curriculum.eleducation.org/curriculum/ela/2019/grade-6/module-4/unit-1/lesson-7rel 0.46
- E6 · grade-8 — curriculum.eleducation.org/curriculum/ela/2019/grade-8/module-1/unit-1rel 0.45
- E7 · grade-6 — curriculum.eleducation.org/curriculum/ela/2019/grade-6/module-4/unit-2/lesson-10rel 0.45
- E8 · grade-6 — curriculum.eleducation.org/curriculum/ela/2019/grade-6/module-4/unit-1/lesson-7rel 0.45
- E9 · grade-6 — curriculum.eleducation.org/curriculum/ela/2019/grade-6/module-4/unit-2/lesson-10rel 0.45
- E10 · grade-6 — curriculum.eleducation.org/curriculum/ela/2019/grade-6/module-4/unit-2/lesson-10rel 0.44
- E11 · grade-6 — curriculum.eleducation.org/curriculum/ela/2019/grade-6/module-4/unit-1/lesson-7rel 0.43
- E12 · ms-curriculum-map — curriculum.eleducation.org/curriculum-map/ela/2019/grade-6/module-2rel 0.43
Evidence is stored as references + retrieval scores (the chunk text isn’t snapshotted); open the source to read the passage in context.