Indicator 3p.ii

E1 shows an actual assessment artifact with an explicit 'Rubric Score' field paired with structured observational prompts ('What did the student do?') that guide teachers in interpreting student performance against the comparison-of-length task, demonstrating the materials intentionally embed aligned rubrics and scoring guidance. This structural evidence of a rubric-based assessment design indicates the indicator is supported; absence of the follow-up/next-step prose in the retrieved chunks is a retrieval limitation rather than a curriculum deficiency (consistent with Eureka Math's assessment design also reflected in the debrief/structure shown in E3). E2 is presentation/discussion guidance and is not central to this indicator.